Thanks to That Bald Guy for the Wordpress advice!
Do I look like I care?
My argument has always been thus: believe whatever you want to believe, but don't push that belief on other people or deride them for believing differently.
There was a time in the past century when women were appreciated for being women: lovely, curvy, smart, elegant, enthralling, distracting. While their rights were not yet guaranteed by any means, men were men and as such had a proper and healthy dedication to the women in their lives. This was well before the pornification of the country and the heroin-addict chic that led to such visual atrocities (and crimes against their own gender) as Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan and their ilk.
While affordable luxuries are in high demand during The Suckage, as the economy starts to look up we should focus on something more palatable than frugality: excess. It might not be politically correct to talk about this in a time when people are using terms like “stealth wealth” and “staycation” to hide such indulgence, but let’s face it: more is more, and more tastes damn good.
We food snobs enjoy a mélange of “fancy” food whenever we can. It ranges from varieties of oysters to duck confit or perhaps an amuse bouche of cucumber mousse over an heirloom tomato puree. Rich, fresh and flavorful, dishes such as these awaken the senses and make the palate sing. But after a weekend of dining out and tasting local chefs' culinary whims (or our own), we often go right back to basics with comfort food. Every culture has their favorites, each dish a twist on something basic: corned beef and cabbage, chicken adobo, potato pierogies, fresh rice with Spam and eggs. These dishes are equally important in the quest for that perfect bite. Like the delicate flavors of a finely crafted entrée, dining is all about balance.
Part of being a healthy food snob is decorum: the white tablecloth, the heavy silverware, the white china plates. Somehow, it makes your meal taste even better. But in “these times of economic hardship” -- or as I like to call it, “The Suckage” – going out for a meal in that kind of proper environment can easily set you back a minimum of $75 for two. And it’s unheard of to make that kind of space for dining when you’re chowing down at work in a cubicle, eating last night’s leftovers. The solution? Head to your local small housewares shop or BB&B and pick up silverware singles for $1.49 to $3 apiece and a nice plate or bowl. You can even find some inexpensive cloth napkins. It will add affordable flavor to your leftover roast and add a taste of civilization to an often uncivilized work day.
Philosophers have called death the great equalizer. Nope: it’s food. As my grandmother in Jersey used to say, “Ya gotta eat”, and she was right. Americans spend around $2,500 a year on out-of-home food, meaning that we are either a society of culinary adventurers or just plain too lazy to cook. Hopefully, you end up somewhere in the middle. The fact remains that we all face the biological imperative to eat, often relying on our taste buds to guide us to our next main course. But the eternal question remains: Food or Fuel? That question can be broken down even further to a more eloquent and important question: Dining or Eating? Whether you’re cooking a great meal at home or trying that cool new brasserie down the street, always opt for dining: it is the enjoyment of each bite. Eating for fuel is like sitting behind a concrete post in a movie theater: you get the general essence, but you never really enjoy it as much as you could.
The current trial underway in Sweden is important to all consumers, especially those of us who are of the nerd persuasion. The outcome may decide how media is distributed and how much hold the music industry still has on your entertainment dollar (spoiler: not much).The fact is that the music industry’s revenues have been artificially inflated for decades because of limited consumer options. The last 15 years of innovation have lifted those limitations, effectively leaving the music industry with an obsolete, defective business model of monopolized production technology, forced album bundling, and almost nonexistent competition in the realm of home entertainment. What is happening now - the decline of music profits and the piracy witch hunt by the music industry - is merely the panicked struggle of a dying business model, a complacent industry’s refusal to accept its diminishing role in a digital world. The pirates are not the reason, and the decline is the not the disease. It is the cure.
Did I tell you? Yes, I told you.The Blackberry Storm sucks, despite their best efforts, which also sucked. (You're trying to take on the iPhone? Everyone else failed: why are you different?) Users can't make calls, and they couldn't even figure out to do anything else. Consumers are returning them in droves.
Now, RIM's Blackberry Bold is having problems. The production process was held up by testing errors, and the thing gets hotter than an old laptop battery.
This happens a lot in consumer goods, a la Mercedes and Palm: a product gets popular, models are rushed to market, and quality takes a nose dive.
Please go back to making cheap phones that are best suited as freebies for signing up with providers. The iPhone is the new king; you're just a wannabe serf.
This is important, people.Fantastic and necessary sites such as Pandora, SoMa FM and others are in dire peril of being shut down due to those greedy bastards at the RIAA and other music industry "advocates" (read: thugs). Instead of finding a reasonable way for small internet broadcasters to pay for broadcasting songs, these modern-day protection gangsters are trying to make them pay through the nose.
Bandwidth ain't cheap, and those costs alone can close down some smaller stations. But asking for 0.19 cents per song per listener is piracy on the airwaves. Thousands of listeners can shut it all down; millions will make it go away forever. Why should terrestrial, big-ticket, commercial radio stations be the only ones to play music, and bad music at that? The best music is being made available via small 'net broadcasters who care about their listeners and won't change formats to make a dollar, betraying their audience in the process.
Today is a perfect time to reflect on the discoveries of Charles Darwin: it's his birthday.
Darwin changed the world by realizing that the gradual slope of natural selection is the process through which all things furry, scaly and otherwise adapt and grow… or whither and die. Magic thinking or “intelligent design” is out of the question: it is not science, and it is not true.
Sadly, as with those who think net neutrality is bad, the idea of some Pink Unicorn Designer is not only still alive, it is spreading. Wired has taken the high road and published two important articles so that this issue does not get swept away or forgotten: The Crusade Against Evolution and On Darwin’s Birthday, Dover Still Isn’t Over.
It is now 2008, and while we would like to believe in a world that is full of smart, open-minded people, it turns out that many of us are still just monkeys in pants. Need more evidence? The Catholic church has brought back indulgences.
Inside, I'm screaming.

